This is pretty interesting. The doucment makes this claim: ...we find that newer, "cleaner" tortures first appear in conditions of public monitoring, usually in democratic states. It is only afterward that we find authoritarian states adopting them. If the spread of torture techniques suggests a blurry line between "us" and "them," it also teaches that there's no real boundary between "there" and "here." It would be ignoring history to assume that what happens in an American-run prison in Iraq will stay in Iraq. Soldiers who learn torture techniques abroad get jobs as police when they return, and the new developments in torture you read about today could yet be employed in a neighborhood near you. It is a logical first reaction to refute this claim. The article, however, cites several instances of just this occurance.
Hmmm... |
0 Responses - Click Here to Comment:
Post a Comment